| | | |
| Greatpilgrim |
Original Post: Mar 15 '08, 9:29 pm |
Reply |
|
Reviews written: 272 Member since: Sep 24 '00
|
|
I need validation
I challenged myself to write a 600-word book review. I did it. Why am I so scared to post it? It's a good review, but it's not long. People are going to think it's Helpful. *Angst angst angst*
Sleeper? Carstairs? Anyone? |
| | | |
| meagandowney |
Posted: Mar 16 '08, 8:05 am |
Reply |
|
Reviews written: 352 Member since: Sep 11 '05
in Books |
|
RE: I need validation
All I can offer is that a review being short doesn't necessarily make it less than VH. I don't think you were active when we had the monthly contest that required us to keep reviews short in order to enter. I think that many of us participating learned a lesson in the value of being economical with language.
I don't recall what the exact word limit was for that contest - 500 words, perhaps? - but many entries received VH ratings, so there's no reason why yours couldn't garner the same. Besides, if you challenged yourself to do it and you succeeded, why fret over a few Helpfuls? Oh, because this is Epinions . . . |
| | | |
| sleeper54 |
Posted: Mar 16 '08, 11:28 am |
Reply |
|
Reviews written: 433 Member since: Feb 24 '01
|
|
RE: I need validation
Quote: meagandowney All I can offer is that a review being short doesn't necessarily make it less than VH. I don't think you were active when we had the monthly contest that required us to keep reviews short in order to enter. I think that many of us participating learned a lesson in the value of being economical with language.
I don't recall what the exact word limit was for that contest - 500 words, perhaps? - but many entries received VH ratings, so there's no reason why yours couldn't garner the same. Besides, if you challenged yourself to do it and you succeeded, why fret over a few Helpfuls? Oh, because this is Epinions . . .
What maddog said.
The site 'lean-n-mean' sweepstakes was indeed 500 words. It worked great, especially for the media categories.
Occasional 'Helpful' rates are great. Someone took the time to read carefully and (dang it) truly express their thoughts about the review. I take 'Helpfuls' as a compliment . Only when they begin to 'pile up' should you worry about them.
Anyway, post it and see what peeps think. Epinions and life are too short to worry about meeting the expectations of others. Meet your own first.
...tom...
. |
| | | |
| jsgoddess |
Posted: Mar 16 '08, 11:51 am |
Reply |
|
Reviews written: 140 Member since: Apr 06 '00
in Books, Magazines & Newspapers |
|
Hooray for short reviews
Personally, it's the abundance of twelve million word reviews that prevents me from reading and rating as much as I used to.
Julie |
| | | |
| fresita |
Posted: Apr 03 '08, 6:27 pm |
Reply |
|
Reviews written: 161 Member since: Mar 24 '01
|
|
Shorter is usually better.
I was surprised when I started writing here to find that short reviews were automatically given lower ratings. The best writers are those who express the most meaning in the fewest words. |
| | | |
| hist |
Posted: Apr 04 '08, 8:33 am |
Reply |
|
Reviews written: 678 Member since: Feb 21 '02
|
|
RE: Shorter is usually better.
Quote: fresita I was surprised when I started writing here to find that short reviews were automatically given lower ratings. The best writers are those who express the most meaning in the fewest words.
While there are some people who respond like that, I don't believe short *automatically* means "less helpful."
I do believe that many shorter reviews don't contain enough information to be considered "very helpful" (by me, anyway) because of the way they're written. But it's not just because they're short. It's because they're short *and* the writer included too many irrelevancies.
If you're going to write a shorter review, then make sure it's short and complete.
Dave |
| | | |
| fresita |
Posted: Apr 04 '08, 11:47 am |
Reply |
|
Reviews written: 161 Member since: Mar 24 '01
|
|
RE: Shorter is usually better.
Yes, I agree that a review that doesn't contain enough information isn't as helpful as one that does. The problem is when a long review with less information than other short reviews automatically receives a higher rating.
I haven't posted many reviews here over the years, but I use this site a lot to research my purchases. Often the highest-rated reviews aren't of much help and at times are so bloated I give up and look for the reviews further down the line.
Unfortunately, I've found that eliminating any "fluff" from a review is the surest way to guarantee a low rating. |
| | | |
| fresita |
Posted: Apr 04 '08, 12:14 pm (Updated: Apr 18 '08, 6:57 am) |
Reply |
|
Reviews written: 161 Member since: Mar 24 '01
|
|
Perhaps I should clarify:
There are some items which require a of lot words to give potential customers the information they need. Others don't. The problem arises when a reviewer of a simple item feels the need to elongate his review to get a higher rating.
Enter fluff.
I don't blame the reviewer, because without the fluff his review would get buried, but most customers don't want to hear the life story of Joe Stranger when deciding which brand of salt to buy. |
| | | |
| inspiredwritin |
Posted: Apr 12 '08, 11:34 pm |
Reply |
|
Reviews written: 1 Member since: Apr 10 '08
|
|
RE: I need validation
Be confident and just do it! I write book reviews as a short stories editor and I started out just like you!
I've just started a website to share my writing successes with beginning writers. I tell them to just start as you can't learn from mistakes if you don't make any! You will learn to modify and hone your writing as you go.
I bet your review is really good. Share it! Build a fan base.
PS I'm still waiting for account verification before I can share my lovely review of 'Girl With a Pearl Earring.' It's still an unpublished draft sadly! |